Responsible fantasy, yes. Personal insults no. But WTC has a point.
.....I wish people would follow our example and instead of kidnapping and beating and raping women for real, they would hire a hooker, or a mistress and set some rules for roleplaying. This would be a lot of a better world if everybody did that. A world where people were tought not to repress their basic instinct but to channel them out in a controlled and fun environment.
This forum is not about hurting women, or men. This forum is about the arts of tickle torture and to explore all aspect that surrounds that fantasy, including sex, love, romance, cries, roleplaying games, "non-con play", etc.
The importance here is that rules are set before the filming starts.
Have you read all the members that want to see a model tickle tortured to tears?
Members are entitled to express their opinion about a clip, but stick to the clip and do not get personal. I think thats the message of this thread.
That
should've been the message of this thread, but I was already referred to as an "asshole" for a reasonable statement about a producer's
perspective after he was unnecessarily snarky for no reason.
If I had put out a video claiming to be *real non-con to ANY extent --- or if I had made stupid comments about someone's appearance --- THEN I'd have easily earned the title, boasting real abuse --- but that was far from the case.
If someone produces a video that states and seems --- realistically, with crying and protesting --- that the lee didn't know what she was in for, and that there was non-con involved --- that's actively promoting harm to women.
That says, this is ok ---- and here it is broadcast with no consequences
and there ARE several videos or producers who still have material up which is considered possible real non-con, even if it's older.
Those productions go well beyond living out a fantasy responsibly.
That's where
WheresTheClip has a point --- some of it appears to be tolerated (or requested) though it seems to be real, whether it's older or not.
Unfortunately as you said yourself, there are those who ask for extremes --- and that's fine ---- but there are also too many who have asked for
real non-con, and that's disturbing.
And I've seen them publicly refer each other to the seemingly real abusive videos I mention above.
You're right, we're all here hopefully to explore and share fantasies to (practically any extreme, without damage...) with willing adults who fully agree & know what they're in for, hopefully with safeguards especially if they haven't done it before.
Your advertising hasn't always been the most responsible either, to be honest, and you had me wondering more than once,
but at least you cleared it up quickly
in the thread/s in question, to my knowledge. By the time I saw it you'd clarified it.
You didn't just sling snide comments from another corner of the forum, you were forthright and addressed the problem directly.
That's greatly appreciated.
*Now I know to look and see to some extent if a model's been through it before, and is returning for more, and I'm aware of more cues which reveal there's acting rather than unwilling suffering ---- and I'm still no connaisseur, but I shouldn't need to be either
Concern for newbies, and for appearances was mentioned ---- we have to ask, how do these vids look to those who aren't as well versed? To someone who's just beginning to explore?
Many of these do have more obvious clues that there's willing acting going on, but some of these productions (all around) look bad, and make us look like abusive freaks regardless.
Which is why I don't think it's unreasonable for there to be disclaimers stating no one was ignorant or unwilling to any extent, not to kill the fantasy but at least not to promote abuse. Or make us really look like freaks.